The Trump administration has taken a significant step in escalating its row with Harvard University, announcing plans to cut the remaining US federal contracts with the prestigious institution. This move is reportedly in response to the university's stance on pro-Palestine student activism and its racial diversity policies.

The decision is the latest development in a long-standing dispute between the federal government and Harvard, which has been a vocal advocate for diversity and inclusion on campus. The university has faced criticism from the Trump administration for its handling of pro-Palestine student activism, with some officials arguing that the university has not done enough to curb anti-Israel sentiment on campus.

The Trump administration has also taken issue with Harvard's racial diversity policies, which aim to increase diversity and inclusion on campus. The administration has argued that these policies unfairly discriminate against certain groups of students, despite evidence suggesting that they are necessary to address longstanding inequalities in higher education.

The cutting of federal contracts with Harvard is likely to have significant implications for the university, which relies heavily on federal funding for research and other programs. The move may also have broader implications for higher education in the US, as it could set a precedent for the federal government to withhold funding from universities that do not comply with its demands.

It's worth noting that the Trump administration's actions are part of a larger trend of increased scrutiny of universities and their policies. In recent years, there has been a growing debate about the role of universities in promoting diversity and inclusion, with some arguing that they have a responsibility to provide a platform for all viewpoints, while others argue that they have a duty to protect students from hate speech and discrimination.

The row between the Trump administration and Harvard is also reflective of the complex and often contentious relationship between the federal government and universities in the US. While universities rely on federal funding to operate, they also value their independence and autonomy, and may be reluctant to comply with demands that they see as intrusive or overly restrictive.

As the situation continues to unfold, it will be important to watch how Harvard and other universities respond to the Trump administration's actions, and how the federal government's policies on diversity and inclusion evolve in the coming months and years. One thing is certain, however: the cutting of federal contracts with Harvard marks a significant escalation in the row between the Trump administration and the university, and is likely to have far-reaching implications for higher education in the US.